The findings of this study provide further evidence for the utility of the L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting extension to both a preemployment evaluation context and a novel population. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Classification accuracy analyses provided additional evidence for the utility of the L-r and K-r scales by supporting their respective cut scores listed in the MMPI–2–RF manual (Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2011 Ben-Porath, Y. Additionally, L-r and K-r added incremental predictive utility over one another when differentiating the standard instruction and underreporting groups. Results indicated that individuals who completed the MMPI–2–RF with underreporting instructions exhibited significantly lower scores on the majority of the MMPI–2–RF substantive scales, and significantly higher scores on the L-r and K-r validity scales. We used a combined sample of 784 university students, with 173 participants completing the MMPI–2–RF with instruction to underreport in the context of applying for a job, and 611 completing the test under standard instructions. The study aimed to increment the previous literature in this field using a New Zealand population. ) Uncommon Virtues (L-r) and Adjustment Validity (K-r) scales in detecting underreporting. The following report was generated from Q-global, Pearson’s web-based scoring and reporting application, using Ms. This study examined the validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2–Restructured Form (MMPI–2–RF Tellegen & Ben-Porath, 2011 Ben-Porath, Y. MMPI-2-RF T SCORES (BY DOMAIN) PROTOCOL VALIDITY SUBSTANTIVE SCALES Scale scores shown in bold font are interpreted in the report. Case descriptions do not accompany MMPI-2-RF reports, but are provided here as background information.

Mmpi 2 rf scale descriptions